Basically, if you shoot RAW, this lens is not very good with vignetting and distortion, and sharpness in the corners are not great either. This reminds me of the 18-55mm kit lens that came with the NEX-5/5N. Horrible distortion and similar soft corners. But, I think as a kit lens, the faults of the 16-50mm lens is bearable. It does offer a much wider angle than the 18-55mm at similar prices. When bought as a package with the camera, this lens is only $150, less than half the price of buying by itself.
It is disappointing that the 16-50mm lens is not better. Sony relies on software correction for the design flaws but this does not do any good for RAW shooters like me. But, I will probably buy it with the camera anyway, if I decide to buy the NEX-6.
Pink Tulip - Canon 1D Mark III & EF 100mm f2.8L IS. click for larger.
Yu Lin - Read this review
ReplyDeletehttp://www.ephotozine.com/article/sony-e-16-50mm-f-3-5-5-6-oss-lens-review-20667
I'd buy it with a NEX 6 in a heart beat
James, the review did not say how the test was done. Was with jpeg or RAW? From the sample pictures, it looks like it was shot with jpeg. But you are right, this lens' small size and wider angle at 24mm is a huge selling point and coupled with a relatively low price, it's hard to resist.
DeleteI'd guess jpeg too. You're absolutely right - size and wide angle make this a winner.
DeleteI bought a NEX-6 simply because I was looking for a smaller, high-quality camera that I would actually carry with me 99% of the time. That said, I'm happy with the camera and the lens for that reason. I can deal with any issues that might come up with the lens (but haven't really seen anything major yet).
ReplyDeleteThanks for the update with your experience. real actual user experience is more important brief reviews.
Delete