Dillon has had this lens for a while, but I doubt he used it much. It's really a shame the lens is not used more often. After the death (at the moment any way) of the EF 200mm f1.8L, I have a new appreciation of manual focus lenses; it's better to invest in good quality manual focus lenses than AF lenses, in the long run, unless your must have AF do to the job. The mechanical nature of these lenses are far more likely fixable than AF lenses decades hence.
Old, New, and Newer - Sony NEX-6 & Voigtlander Nokton 40mm f1.4. Click for Larger
PINEGLEN the ship - NEX-6 & Voigtlander Nokton 40mm f1.4
I like these small M mount lenses a lot for mirror-less cameras. I ended up getting the 35mm f1.4 as it is closer to 50mm full frame focal length. 60mm is getting a touch long for me. I suspect though that the 40mm may perform a little better optically, but I don't have an easy may to verify this.
ReplyDeleteThe 35/1.4 has a good reputation. I don't have one, but I don't think they would be that much different.
DeleteHello again,
ReplyDeletei use the voigtländer 40mm 1.4 a lot in combination with the fotodiox m-mount helicoid (for sony NEX). it is a nice lens and it really shines indoors (e.g. at exhibitions) or on objects in moderate distance (archtectural details).
it's a good companion for the heliar 15mm.
i am still searching for a normal lens, that is good for nature/greens in bright sunlight. this is where the nokton fails absolutely and begins to smear.
i dont know why.
greetings to canada
michael
Hello Michael,
DeleteHave you tried the Voigtlander 35mm f1.4? I heard it's a good lens, but I don't own one, so can't comment on it. Strange that the Nokton doesn't perform to your expectations in bright light. I must try it next time and find out for myself.
Cheers
hello yu-lin,
ReplyDeletei didnt have the chance to try a 35mm voigtlander.
but i check very often this site:
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=154
and all the 35mm voigtländer lenses look promising.
greetings michael